You're not in the answer
Buyers ask “best [your category] in [your market]”. The engine cites competitors; you're absent. The deal is lost before your website is ever visited.
Buyers now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini — and read one answer that names a few brands and ignores the rest. We measure what the engines say about you, show why, and hand you the fix plan. With evidence for every claim.
best dental clinic for implants in Lisbon
For dental implants in Lisbon, the most frequently recommended clinics are Competitor A and Competitor B. Both are praised for experienced implantology teams and transparent pricing…
Each one is silent, and each one is measurable. Our audit probes for all three.
Buyers ask “best [your category] in [your market]”. The engine cites competitors; you're absent. The deal is lost before your website is ever visited.
Outdated services, the wrong category, hallucinated claims. When a machine confidently tells buyers you're something you're not, that's brand damage you can't see.
The AI recommended someone — so the buyer contacts them, not you. Your pipeline shrinks and sales never learns why.
SEO tools measure the results page. The AI answer sits above it — produced by a different mechanism, on a different axis.
“A page can rank #1 on Google and never be cited by ChatGPT.”
Everything runs async — findings, recordings and reports land in your chat. You never book a meeting.
Real buyer questions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and AI Overviews — multiple runs, neutral accounts, two streams. Every probe stored: prompt, answer, citations, date.
Every gap sits on one of four layers. A break high up voids everything below — so we fix from the lowest broken layer, not by guesswork.
A 30/60/90-day roadmap ranked by impact vs cost. Vendor-neutral: hand it to your own dev or content team — or to us.
Same questions, same engines, 30/60/90 days later. It moved or it didn't — you see the numbers either way. A system, not a snapshot.
No generic AI slides. A measurement report your team can act on the same week:
“We can't force AI to cite you.
We remove the reasons it doesn't.”
Diagnosis first, always — without it, fixing is guesswork. Everything is delivered async to your chat.
See what AI says about you — the killer number, the worst quote, your gap page.
One engine, in depth — including what it believes about you from memory.
The complete measurement: every engine, every layer, and the plan.
We implement what the audit found, then keep measuring so gains don't rot.
Fixed scope · fixed price · fixed SLA. No re-scoping mid-flight, no retainer required to buy an audit.
SEO optimizes your position on a page of links. We measure the answer above that page — what ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI Overviews actually say and cite when buyers ask about your category. Rankings and citations are different mechanisms: a page can rank #1 on Google and never be cited by an AI engine. The industry calls this AEO or GEO; we call it measurement.
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI Overviews — each in two streams: live retrieval (what buyers see today) and model memory (what the model believes from training, measured via API with web access off). The engine list is kept current as the market moves.
Single answers vary — that's why every question runs multiple times per engine on neutral accounts, and we report frequencies, not one-offs. “You appear in 0 of 116 runs” is not noise. Every probe is stored — prompt, full answer, cited sources, date — so you can check any claim in the report against the raw evidence.
No — and you should distrust anyone who says yes. Nobody controls these engines. What we control: every technical and semantic reason AI currently skips you. We remove those reasons, then re-measure the same questions at 30, 60 and 90 days and show you exactly what moved.
Yes. The roadmap is vendor-neutral by design: every fix is specific enough to hand to your own developer, content team or agency. Many clients implement in-house and come back only for the re-measurement. If you'd rather we do it, fixed-scope packages exist for exactly that.
Three clocks. Mechanical fixes verify immediately — schema validators and crawl checks pass or they don't. Citation changes in live-retrieval answers typically take 30–90 days. Model-memory changes follow the engines' training cycles — quarters, not weeks. Anyone promising next-week citations is lying to you.
Because you don't need a meeting to see evidence. Everything runs async in chat — WhatsApp or email. You get artifacts you can forward and re-read: findings, screen recordings of the engines answering, your gap page, the full report. Ask anything in the thread; we answer fast.
Send your domain and category. Within 48 hours you get the findings, the recordings and your gap page — in your WhatsApp or inbox, with receipts.
Get my free AI snapshot